A Gallup poll conducted in Ukraine in early September showed that 70% of respondents believe that Ukraine must continue the war with Russia until victory is achieved, whereas 26% believe that negotiations should begin as soon as possible in order to end the hostilities. Gallup experts note that people express higher levels of support for continuing the war the further away they are located from the actual battleground, and the opposite is also true: support is lowest in communities right near the front line. In Western Ukraine, 83% of respondents voice their support of continuing the war, whilst in the south and east, that figure stands at 56%-58% (the survey did not include Ukraine’s occupied territories). The greatest variation among socio-demographic groups can be observed in terms of gender: 76% of men support continuing the war until victory is achieved, opposed to 64% of women. The other important factor is education: 80% of respondents with a university degree support continuing the war, and among those who have a secondary education or lower the figure stands at 68%.
When prompted to explain what they mean by "victory", 91% of respondents chose the answer 'Return all territories lost since 2014, including Crimea", 4% gave a similar answer, but did not mention Crimea, and another 5% want Ukraine to reclaim territories lost since February 2022.
Generally, the idea that 56-64% of respondents support continuing the war until victory is achieved does not seem all that convincing or "trustworthy", given the backdrop of increasingly protracted hostilities, Russian mobilisation and the upcoming winter, which Ukraine will have to face with a seriously damaged energy infrastructure grid. In any case, the situation looks somewhat less homogenous than the one described by the Kyiv International Institute of Sociology (KIIS), which conducted its own survey in early September. Respondents were asked to choose between the following answers: "Ukraine may have to give up part of its territories in order to achieve peace and preserve its independence as soon as possible," or "Under no circumstances should Ukraine give up its territories, even if this leads to a protracted war and threatens its independence." 87% of respondents chose the second option, and according to KIIS, regional differences were insignificant. The overall percentage is also higher, with 83% of people choosing the second option in the south, 85% in the east and 91% in the west. A significant difference in answers can be found only by taking into account various linguistic and ethnic groups: for example, 57% of Russian-speaking Russian respondents support the uncompromising option, 24% are in favour of territorial concessions, and another 19% found it difficult to answer. Among Russian-speaking Ukrainians, such answers were chosen by 85%, 10% and 5% of respondents, respectively.
The authors of the study note that the survey was carried out during the most successful phase of the Ukrainian counteroffensive in the Kharkiv region, between the 7th-13th of September. The Gallup survey ran from September 2th to 11th, meaning it was not affected by information coming from the battleground. It should also be mentioned that the counteroffensive’s effect will eventually subside. Having said that, it has substantially altered both Ukraine and Russia’s perceptions of the war and its next phases, as well as the perceptions of the Ukrainian population. Taking all of this into account, the Gallup poll sheds more light on war fatigue in Ukraine, and in what social groups these sentiments are likely to increase.
Even in the Gallup poll, differences regarding the two opposing strategies are not critical in Ukraine’s macroregions. These differences become more pronounced only when taking into account how radicalised respondents are regarding nationalist views and positions. A joint survey conducted by the Democratic Initiatives Foundation and the Razumkov Center at the same time as the Gallup poll (in early September), shows that over the past year, the number of respondents who positively assess the actions of Stepan Bandera has increased from 31% to 50%. To add to this, 73% of respondents from western regions hold this view, whilst in the east and the south, that number stands at 30% and 20%, respectively. The same polarisation can be observed regarding the de-Russification of toponyms: 79% of respondents in the west support this initiative, while in the south the number stands at only 27%, and in the east — 44% (excluding the occupied territories). Thus, although there are a range of issues in Ukrainian society that have polarised its citizens, the question of "negotiations or the return of territories" is currently not one of them.
The Foundations are Crumbling: Polls show that the Russian authorities are suffering a fatal setback in their efforts to promote traditional values among Russians
The Kremlin’s resources for ideological indoctrination currently appear limited: the influence of television is waning, while attempts to dominate the internet are being met with resistance. As a result, ideological pressure ‘from above’ tends either to foster a form of neo-Soviet ‘doublethink’ or to provoke a backlash of resistance.
Between The Inevitable and The Unreliable: Why Ukrainian society considers territorial concessions futile, but yet is willing to discuss them
The corruption scandal at the end of 2025 did not undermine the legitimacy of the Ukrainian authorities or of Volodymyr Zelensky, and the bombardment of Ukrainian cities did not weaken the spirit of resistance among Ukrainians. Although around 80% of Ukrainians believe that Putin will attack their country again and that a territorial compromise would prove futile, about 40% are prepared to accept a formula of ‘territory in exchange for security guarantees’.
America does not trust Putin or Trump: Americans support increased military aid to Kyiv, have a low opinion of Trump's Ukraine policy, and doubt the likelihood of reaching a reliable agreement with Putin