In the latest "Levada-Center" survey, there is a slight decrease in the tension caused in society by the mobilisation announcement. The proportion of those who say they are "very" or "rather" concerned about the events in Ukraine, which amounted to 74% in August and jumped to 87% in September and October, reached 80% by the end of November (the usual figure for the first months of the war). Also, the percentage of those who believe that the military operations should be continued has slightly increased compared to October, and the percentage of those who think it is necessary to start peace negotiations has decreased (57% vs. 36% in October and 53% vs. 41% in November).
Supporters of peace talks remain in the majority, and in the younger age groups (18-39 years old) their share exceeds 60%. The gender axis of differences in this issue is no less significant: here the spread makes up over 20 percentage points. 51% of men and only 31% of women are in favor of continuing the war, and, respectively, 62% of women and 43% of men support peace negotiations. There was a certain increase in the number of those who support the continuation of hostilities in the male group. Another factor contributing to the militancy is financial prosperity: among those who "barely have enough to eat," 32% favor the continuation of military operations, and among those who can buy durable goods, 47% support the continuation of hostilities.
Back in September the proportion of those who consider the course of the "special operation" to be successful fell by 20 percentage points (to 54% from 73% in May), in November this figure remained almost the same. Also, the timing of the end of the war is "moving back" in the respondents' opinion: currently, 40% expect it to end within a year, while 41% expect it to happen somewhere beyond that term; in August this ratio was 48% against 31%.
The emotional background of the war is worsening. From time to time, respondents are asked about their feelings about the war in Ukraine. We group these "feelings" into four categories: positive emotions (satisfaction, elation), "pride for Russia," "unfocused anxiety" (depression, anxiety, shock), and "focused condemnation" ("anger, indignation, shame"). The percentage of respondents experiencing positive emotions has decreased from 15% to 10%, and the number of respondents feeling proud of Russia has decreased from 48% to 42%. The proportion of respondents characterized by focused condemnation remained unchanged — at 18% (respondents could give more than one answer, so the sum of answers exceeds 100%).
The same trends are observed in the October survey of the "Chronicles" project — a blurring of expectations for the war's end, adaptation to its prolonging, a worsening of the emotional background, and stabilisation in responses to the question about its support.
Between The Inevitable and The Unreliable: Why Ukrainian society considers territorial concessions futile, but yet is willing to discuss them
The corruption scandal at the end of 2025 did not undermine the legitimacy of the Ukrainian authorities or of Volodymyr Zelensky, and the bombardment of Ukrainian cities did not weaken the spirit of resistance among Ukrainians. Although around 80% of Ukrainians believe that Putin will attack their country again and that a territorial compromise would prove futile, about 40% are prepared to accept a formula of ‘territory in exchange for security guarantees’.
America does not trust Putin or Trump: Americans support increased military aid to Kyiv, have a low opinion of Trump's Ukraine policy, and doubt the likelihood of reaching a reliable agreement with Putin
Peace on The Aggressor's Terms: Why Ukrainians see concessions to Moscow as futile