In the latest "Levada-Center" survey, there is a slight decrease in the tension caused in society by the mobilisation announcement. The proportion of those who say they are "very" or "rather" concerned about the events in Ukraine, which amounted to 74% in August and jumped to 87% in September and October, reached 80% by the end of November (the usual figure for the first months of the war). Also, the percentage of those who believe that the military operations should be continued has slightly increased compared to October, and the percentage of those who think it is necessary to start peace negotiations has decreased (57% vs. 36% in October and 53% vs. 41% in November).
Supporters of peace talks remain in the majority, and in the younger age groups (18-39 years old) their share exceeds 60%. The gender axis of differences in this issue is no less significant: here the spread makes up over 20 percentage points. 51% of men and only 31% of women are in favor of continuing the war, and, respectively, 62% of women and 43% of men support peace negotiations. There was a certain increase in the number of those who support the continuation of hostilities in the male group. Another factor contributing to the militancy is financial prosperity: among those who "barely have enough to eat," 32% favor the continuation of military operations, and among those who can buy durable goods, 47% support the continuation of hostilities.
Back in September the proportion of those who consider the course of the "special operation" to be successful fell by 20 percentage points (to 54% from 73% in May), in November this figure remained almost the same. Also, the timing of the end of the war is "moving back" in the respondents' opinion: currently, 40% expect it to end within a year, while 41% expect it to happen somewhere beyond that term; in August this ratio was 48% against 31%.
The emotional background of the war is worsening. From time to time, respondents are asked about their feelings about the war in Ukraine. We group these "feelings" into four categories: positive emotions (satisfaction, elation), "pride for Russia," "unfocused anxiety" (depression, anxiety, shock), and "focused condemnation" ("anger, indignation, shame"). The percentage of respondents experiencing positive emotions has decreased from 15% to 10%, and the number of respondents feeling proud of Russia has decreased from 48% to 42%. The proportion of respondents characterized by focused condemnation remained unchanged — at 18% (respondents could give more than one answer, so the sum of answers exceeds 100%).
The same trends are observed in the October survey of the "Chronicles" project — a blurring of expectations for the war's end, adaptation to its prolonging, a worsening of the emotional background, and stabilisation in responses to the question about its support.
Wartime Russia is characterised by a collectively sustained equilibrium, in which citizens simultaneously adapt to the war, distance themselves from its consequences, and reproduce the conditions that enable it to continue. At the heart of this equilibrium lies a desire for social ‘synchronisation’, that is, the need to align with an imagined majority. This is driven not by superficial conformism but by a commitment to preserving social order and preventing social divisions.
How Much Has The Bubble of Support Deflated? The era of optimism and loyalty in public sentiment is becoming a thing of the past
Just as after the annexation of Crimea, the period of exceptionally high approval ratings for Putin and heightened political loyalty that began with the full-scale invasion of Ukraine lasted four years and is now entering a phase of decline. This dynamic carries the risk of greater political turbulence against the backdrop of a stalemated war and growing structural imbalances in the economy.
The Foundations are Crumbling: Polls show that the Russian authorities are suffering a fatal setback in their efforts to promote traditional values among Russians
The Kremlin’s resources for ideological indoctrination currently appear limited: the influence of television is waning, while attempts to dominate the internet are being met with resistance. As a result, ideological pressure ‘from above’ tends either to foster a form of neo-Soviet ‘doublethink’ or to provoke a backlash of resistance.